I am not much in politics, but with all the hype of election and who to vote for made me curious to find out who all are running for election and their views and values. I thought who could be worse then Bush right now, but guess what! After reading this and the article below and several others, I suppose there can be someone!
This reminds me of the hadeeth of the Prophet, sallallahu alihi wasalam, that in later times believers will be tested with fitan after fitan, and with each fitnah they will think that nothing could be worse then that yet to find the next fintah even bigger then the previous one. So as Bush leaves us, I hope and I pray that the next one is not a bigger fitnah then him.
I seek Allah’s refuge and His protection from the fitan, what is apparent of it and what is hidden, amin.
Giuliani’s Marriage of Convenience
Linda Heard, email@example.com
I used to think of former New York mayor and presidential hopeful Rudy Giuliani as a capable, benign Mr. Nice Guy; a fairly ordinary man who faced an extraordinary calling on 9/11 to put his shattered city to rights. I now know I was wrong.
Giuliani’s open countenance and wide grin belie a ruthlessly ambitious individual unashamedly using that fateful day as the headline on his presidential resume. He is even shown himself willing to forge a marriage of convenience with one of America’s best-known anti-Islamic bigots Pat Robertson to garner the sizable evangelical vote.
Scarily, Giuliani’s “go after the terrorists” strategy appears to be working even at a time when many candidates avoid the “war on terror” like the plague, concentrating instead on how to win hearts and minds and improve America’s worldwide standing.
Giuliani is currently leading the Republican race and is neck-and-neck with Democratic frontrunner Hillary Clinton. If he manages to take the White House he’ll be akin to Bush on steroids, remarked Democratic runner John Edwards. It may have been said tongue in cheek but Edwards is right. People in our part of the world may even be pleading: “Come back Bush, all is forgiven”.
From the perspective of this region a Giuliani-Robertson union will be one manufactured in hell in the event the former mayor gets the top job and for sure the hands on the Doomsday Clock will be moved even closer to midnight.
In many respects they’re a veritable odd couple. Certainly they hold very different views on gun control, abortion and gay rights. But Robertson has decided to forgive Giuliani’s propensity to swap wives for girlfriends as well as some of his more liberal stances. “To me, the overriding issue before the American people is the defense of our population from the bloodlust of Islamic terrorists,” said Robertson.
Secondly, both men are passionately pro-Israel albeit for different reasons. Both do not support a Palestinian state; Giuliani because such a state would “support terrorism” and threaten US security, and Robertson because his messianic beliefs support the ushering in of Armageddon as a prerequisite to the “Second Coming”.
In 2006, Robertson suggested Ariel Sharon’s illness was a punishment for his policy of “dividing God’s land” – a remark that no doubt referred to the Israeli pullout from Gaza prompted by the former Israeli prime minister.
When the Israeli daily Ha’aretz assembled a panel of eight US election pundits Giuliani was pronounced the best presidential candidate for Israel.
Earlier this year, Robertson announced with certainty that Iran had nuclear weapons and quoted religious texts to back up his belief there would be a war where “states in that region” would join “to move against Israel. “It’s amazing that Iran has come to the fore as it has with a president who says Israel should be wiped off the map” and “who now has atomic weapons”, he said, warning that Israel is entering “the most dangerous time of its existence”.
Giuliani has admitted he wouldn’t hesitate to use military force against Iran’s nuclear program, while his senior foreign policy adviser Norman Podhoretz said, “None of the alternatives to military action – negotiations, sanctions, provoking an internal insurrection – can possibly work”.
The fact that Giuliani would hire the author of “World War IV: The Long Struggle against Islamofascism” as an adviser is eyebrow raising of itself but there’s worse.
Another member of his advisory team is director of the pro-Israel neoconservative think tank Middle East Forum Daniel Pipes who has backed the profiling of Muslims and their scrutiny as members of law enforcement, the diplomatic corps and the military.
Daniel Pipes is also the founder of Campus Watch, an organization that monitors US academia so as to stifle any criticism of Israel.
The fact that Giuliani wholeheartedly welcomed the Robertson anointment is particularly worrying. The latter is known for controversial and bigoted comments as well as calling for the assassination of Venezuelan leader Hugo Chavez.
Robertson also fancies himself as a man of prophecies and regularly appears on Fox News making dire warnings such as major US cities are destined to suffer mass terrorist attacks post-September 2007 that would end the lives of millions of Americans.
But Robertson reserves his most hate-laced comments for Islam and its followers.
He says the “goal of Islam” is “world domination” and has characterized Muslims as “crazed fanatics, while labeling the religion as “satanic” and “motivated by demonic power”.
His new best friend Giuliani recently castigated those Democratic nominees who avoided using the term “Islamic terrorism” during four public debates, which Giuliani says is taking political correctness to extremes.
However, there is a chink of light. Whereas Giuliani will certainly reap a proportion of the evangelical vote now that he’s hugged Pat Robertson such a partnership isn’t likely to go down well with secular conservatives, many of whom view Robertson as a nut job.
We used to plead “anyone but Bush’. Given Giuliani’s stance on this region and the horrible company he keeps, I would sincerely say to the American voters “Please…please…anyone but Rudy“.